Textbroker Blog    

Ask an Editor: Answers

by Keira, Textbroker Editor


We've compiled many of the questions you asked and tasked some team members with answering them. Ed. 1 and Ed. 2 have PhDs in Being Awesome, so we think you're in good hands.


Q. What would happen if I went over the word count and let the client have the extra words for free?

Ed. 1: The fabric of the universe would unravel!

Ed. 2: You would just be giving the client extra words. Some clients may ask you to lower your word count if you go over, but otherwise, you're just writing without pay.


Q. Is there any other way to make it to level 5?

Ed. 1: You could try chocolate. It won't work, but we encourage our authors to try.

Ed. 2: No. We do recommend authors once in a while, but otherwise, authors must pass proofreading prior to consideration.


Q. Do the editors just skim each article and look for major errors or do they check each line carefully? Does each editor read a group of articles from the same writer or do they get one article from one writer so they don't get tired of reading the same writing style?

Ed. 1: Sorry. I only skimmed this question.

Ed. 2: We read every article we receive. The next available editor takes the next author in the queue, and all of that author's work is displayed. We usually rate every article in the batch, but due to time constraints, we may only rate a few, leaving the rest for the next editor. Short articles are generally rated neutrally.


Q. Does the client's rating affect your score?

Ed. 1: No.

Ed. 2: No.


Q. Are ratings to instructions anonymous?

Ed. 1: Yes.

Ed. 2: Yes.


Q. If [a casual] style is desired by the client, will it lower our rating as an author?

Ed. 1: Articles must adhere to business-casual attire, or they are fired!

Ed. 2: We see the client's instructions when we rate the article, so this will not impact your rating. However, we are human; if we missed something in the client's instructions, please let us know.


Q. I get how Toast Broken relates to Textbroker but what do Underwater Bears relate to? They sound like cool creatures, but do they have professional writing skills and, if so, where do they snag their water-resistant laptops?

Ed. 1: Underwater Bears are related to editors through a wormhole in evolution. Don't ask us how a wormhole got into evolution, but we're fairly certain that Darwin would not approve.

Ed. 2: As for their qualifications, all Underwater Bears are board-certified. Contrary to popular belief, Underwater Bears are fully capable of living outside of the water for periods of time. When they surface, we slap some gloves on them and put them to work. No one likes a soggy laptop.


Q. Do they want the voice to be formal as in a Newsweek article? Or informal for a blog? Should it be slightly formal such as a salesperson talking to a potential client? Or should sound like a friend talking to another friend? Do they want 'spicy' language? Do they want it to be funny?

Ed. 1: Pronoun without antecedent!

Ed. 2: If you have questions about an order, please contact the client. We only know as much as you do.


Q. Can we protest [a revision request]? Does anyone protest? How does Textbroker resolve conflicts?

Ed. 1: We welcome peaceable assembly. I prefer to resolve conflicts via flamethrower, but BossCat confiscated my toy.

Ed. 2: When you receive a revision request, you can make the changes, cancel the order or re-submit as-is. If you do the latter, there is a good chance the article will be rejected. If your article is rejected, it will be reviewed by our editorial team.


Q. Is there a deadline for clients to respond to author questions?

Ed. 1: If you want to get paid, the assignment deadline is a good clock to go by.

Ed. 2: No. There is no timeline for client/author communications. The client isn't notified when an author picks up an order.


Q. If you can lower individual articles when grading, why, if an article deserves a level 5 (which is what the graders have written on mine) why isn't it given the 5? I understand averaging them, but if you are going to average a lower grade in, why wouldn't level 5 work be graded as such?

Ed. 1: I'm still stuck at the parentheses.

Ed. 2: Level 5 is a manual setting. Rating individual articles at 5 creates problems in our averaging system, so we rate articles at 4 or lower.


Q. Many writers are concerned, me included, about a stupid mistake being the reason for demotion back to level 4.

So, I'm suggesting a sort of compromise on this one. What if, as you grade the assignments, you continued to average the ratings? Because some writers have written hundreds of articles here and others only a handful, maybe you could average the work monthly? 

Ed. 1: I see math. Hold me.

Ed. 2: Shh, just close your eyes. I've got this one. An author's rating is based on the average of the last five articles for a few reasons. It ensures that authors are constantly working toward maintaining or improving their ratings; it allows us to adjust rankings so that clients receive the quality levels they ordered. Everyone can have a bad day, but if the last few articles we see are sub-par, we will consider demotion. We usually warn the author first, but we reserve the right to demote immediately if necessary.


Q. So my question is: how long do I have to accept a DirectOrder before it expires? Do they ever expire?

Ed. 1: 372 hours; they smell like old milk after that.

Ed. 2: It behooves you to accept your orders as soon as you can. If you wait too long, the client may cancel the order. However, DirectOrders do not expire.


Q. I understand that things have been backed up, but is it really necessary to give clients three days? Which is actually four, given the slowness of auto-accept. We have a day to write most articles. Clients have other tasks to attend, I'm sure, but shouldn't it be more equal?

Ed. 1: Clients pay us.

Ed. 2: There are several reasons for this. Most clients do not work on weekends; clients also may have other clients who need to see the work prior to acceptance. Many of our clients place hundreds or thousands of orders at a time, and trying to approve all of those in three days is difficult enough. Finally, the fact that we place a time limit on acceptance at all is better than many freelancers get. Imagine if you had to go back and forth with a client for months.


Q. Proofreading test: Will you consider changing your policy so that the test taker knows what mistakes they made?

Ed. 1: No.

Ed. 2: The questions are pulled at random from a larger pool. We have no way of tracking which questions you answered, but the questions largely cover the same issues. If you failed the test, focus on spelling, subject/verb agreement and punctuation. Most of the errors fall into these categories.


Q. I have been at level 3 consistently for some time now what can I do to improve my articles to make it to level 4?

Ed. 1: We wanted to install Skee-Ball for author ratings. Then your rating would depend on the skill of the editor, and I've got to say, those years of softball would have really boosted some rankings. BossCat was all for the idea, but the other cats refused unless prizes were awarded. Now we have to use the AP Stylebook. =(

Ed. 2: Please use our feedback for specific instances on how to increase your rating. Otherwise, BossCat has a helpful post here: http://www.textbroker.com/blog/content/15-tips.html


Q. What are the Editors' opinions (or opinion if there is a consensus) of singular "they"?

Ed. 1: Utter chaos.

Ed. 2: We tolerate its usage. Most of the time, you can find another way to write your sentence so that this is never an issue. If you do use it, make sure you have not already defined the subject's gender. If you're talking about Danny DeVito, you would use masculine pronouns.


Thanks for all the questions!

posted on 05/06/2011 - 06.29  |  textbroker blog  |  comments: 32

Comments  
Hilarious. I'd liked to know why some editor ratings have do not have any feedback, and just a rating with no errors pointed out. Can this be answered or even asked here? Are the editors anonymous? Also, I would like for ED. 2 to answer this. Ed. 1 is snarky.

added by: author Rick on 05/07/2011 - 12.50

Thank you for taking the time to answer our questions. Some of the questions I really didn't care about, but I read them all just to see Editor 1's reply! haha Very entertaining and I learned a lot. :)

added by: author Imara6mara on 05/07/2011 - 06.02

'snarky' - I like that and yes they is. lol

added by: author LizG on 05/07/2011 - 08.31

Thanks for the giggles and the information.

added by: author KimH on 05/07/2011 - 08.45

There is something very juvenile about Ed. 1's responses. Ed. 1, are you bored? Are you mad at the world? You sound angry. Please cheer up.

added by: author A-048092 on 05/07/2011 - 12.06

You guys are awesome!

added by: author A. Asa on 05/07/2011 - 12.32

Go Editor 1! You are the cat's pajamas AND the bee's knees! Without you, writing for TB would seem like an endless game of dragnet initiated by the grammar police!
thankyouthanx!

Go Snarky! Go "juvenile...bored...mad at the world" (A-048092). Don't ever cheer up, you're hysterical!

added by: author A-054828 on 05/07/2011 - 01.17

Yay! Thanks so much, that was a great read!

added by: author sunwriter on 05/07/2011 - 01.46

Ed. 1 can't be taken seriously. How can someone take an editor seriously when they construct a sentence out of one word: "Sorry." :-)

added by: author premington on 05/07/2011 - 02.08

Funny and informative! Thank you, Eds. :-D

added by: author MaryR on 05/07/2011 - 02.20

This was great! Thanks for the nice read.

added by: author A-062326 on 05/07/2011 - 02.33

your answers were very informative

added by: author A-055682 on 05/07/2011 - 02.41

Thanks for answering the questions!! I agree with Ed. 1: I'm still stuck at the parentheses on that level 5 question. @_@ Otherwise, some of the questions were pretty useful!

added by: author EditingMom on 05/07/2011 - 03.10

Love this! Thanks for both the solid answers and the lighthearted approach.

added by: author Michelle K on 05/07/2011 - 03.21

Informative and entertaining. Love it

added by: author A-068814 on 05/07/2011 - 03.30

Very enlightening info! And somehow knowing Ed. 1 is out there seems to take some of the bite out of my bruised ego when ya'll catch some of my silly mistakes! Thanks, guys, that you are so personal with us!

added by: author A-062075 on 05/07/2011 - 04.47

Rick,

As much as we would like to, we cannot comment on every article. There are only a handful of editors while thousands of authors are turning in thousands of articles each day. If you haven't received any feedback in a while, please contact us at mail@textbroker.com; we will add a note to your account to try and leave more comments for you.

Best Wishes,
Ed. 1 & Ed. 2

added by:  Textbroker  on 05/07/2011 - 05.14

I love all these questions and comments and answers. What a lot of fun people to work with. I do have a question. I hope it's not dumb. No, it's okay if it's dumb. Do Authors with a 4 start rating get paid more than authors with a 1 star rating?

added by: author A-070567 on 05/07/2011 - 05.40

I have another question? Why does the post above this start with "Rick?"

added by: author A-070567 on 05/07/2011 - 05.41

Ed. 1 sounds suspiciously like bumpy lol

added by: author JonHar88 on 05/07/2011 - 05.49

Where's the haiku?
Otherwise, informative and uplifting, made me laugh! Thanks for the answers.

added by: author LizPenguin on 05/07/2011 - 08.22

Ed. 1 is the comic and Ed. 2 is the "straight man", right :)?

added by: author A-005762 on 05/08/2011 - 12.57

I haven't read the blog for a while and this was the first thing I came back to. Thanks for the laughs! You make me want to write again. :-)

added by: author LBworks on 05/09/2011 - 11.17

Thank goodness, some humor.

added by: author A-027362 on 05/09/2011 - 12.09

Thanks for responding to our questions!

added by: author Yazz on 05/09/2011 - 04.00

Oh, nice I just found this. I feel like I found an "easter egg". :)

added by: author StrigaMort on 05/13/2011 - 10.06

*cough, cough*
Ed.2-
I'm afraid I will have to put you back down at the 4 star rating level. It's "subpar", not sub-par. just teasin', I had to get that one in there, when do you ever get to correct an editor??? lol
Thanks for the awesome Q&A's.

added by: author Snowball on 05/13/2011 - 11.55

Ha ha! You guys are awesome. I totally relate to Editor 1. Life is too short not to make fun of just about everything. Boo-yaa!

added by: author JMCM on 05/18/2011 - 07.20

I'm in love with ed 1.

added by: author DeeDee Gee on 06/02/2011 - 02.41

Ok. while I love comical guys that either hate the question or love the question at least we can keep one another on our toes which is why it's called "TeamWork". Many forget this I assume :( either that or they leave it out of the work place on purpose :( . So as I usually give mercy to those who need it and compassion I hope that we all grow and be more enriched by our clients.

added by: author Mercene on 06/05/2011 - 10.40

Since I just wrote and submitted my first article, I find this forum quite informative, and entertaining.

added by: author Motivated on 06/15/2011 - 07.45

Love the forum and, especially, this post.

added by: author Bill K on 10/10/2011 - 07.12

You need to be logged in as client or author in order to post a comment.